II UKN 484/97
AI generated
Employer not liable for robbery at grocery store; security measures not breach of duty.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the employee's claim for damages against her employer following a robbery at a grocery store. The court found that requiring a store to close after dark and serve customers through barred windows was not a mandatory safety obligation under labor law or general prudence. Consequently, the employer's failure to implement these specific measures did not constitute a wrongful act or breach of duty.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 415 Kodeksu cywilnego; Art. 445 § 1 Kodeksu cywilnego: The employer is not liable for criminal acts committed by third parties unless the employee can prove a wrongful breach of specific safety duties or universally accepted prudence rules.
Keywords
AI generated
employer liability
criminal act third party
safety duty breach
labor law obligations
robbery compensation
general prudence rules
supreme court ruling
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 415 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 445 § 1 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 393 § 12 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Dz. U. Nr 51, poz. 230