II UKN 465/97
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal where factual presumption violated logic and medical evidence rules.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal regarding a dispute over whether a worker's death constituted a work accident. The lower court relied on a factual presumption that an external cause caused the fall, despite established facts showing the victim suffered from severe internal illness and vomiting. The court ruled that such a presumption was invalid because it lacked logical prerequisites and contradicted expert opinions excluding external triggers.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 231 KPC; Art. 233 § 1 KPC: A factual presumption under Art. 231 KPC is valid only when it logically follows from established facts serving as its prerequisites and aligns with life experience.
Keywords
AI generated
factual presumption
work accident
logical prerequisites
medical evidence
cassation appeal
external cause
internal illness
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 231 KPC
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 15 KPC
Art. 102 KPC