I PZ 56/97
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal on appealability grounds, ruling wage claims are monetary matters regardless of amount.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a lower court's rejection of a wage claim. The appellant argued that the right to remuneration was non-monetary, making the appeal admissible despite the low value. The court ruled that wage claims are inherently monetary benefits from employment contracts, thus excluding the appeal due to the value threshold.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 pkt 1 KPC; Art. 17 pkt 1 KPC: A claim for remuneration constitutes a monetary benefit, rendering cassation inadmissible when the disputed value falls below the statutory threshold, regardless of the underlying right's abstract nature.
Keywords
AI generated
cassation admissibility
monetary benefit
wage claim
value threshold
employment contract
remuneration right
procedural exclusion
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 393 pkt 1 KPC
Art. 17 pkt 1 KPC
Art. 385 KPC
Art. 98 § 1 KPC
Art. 391 KPC
Art. 393 § 2 KPC
Art. 22 § 1 in fine KP
Art. 77 KP
Art. 80 KP
Art. 86 KP