Supreme Court quashes labor court judgment for failing to restore procedural time limits and misapplying employment law provisions.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court quashed the lower court's judgment, which had granted the employee's request to reinstate him to work. The lower court incorrectly determined that the employee filed his lawsuit within the statutory deadline, ignoring that the termination notice was only deemed delivered upon postal receipt. The Supreme Court ruled that the lower court failed to apply the specific provision regarding the restoration of expired procedural time limits, necessitating a remand for a new trial.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedart. 61 Kodeks cywilny; art. 300 Kodeksu pracy; art. 264 § 1 Kodeksu pracy; art. 328 § 2 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego; art. 393 § 13 Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego: The court must restore procedural time limits when a claim is filed after expiration, and the lower court's failure to explicitly address this constitutes a ground for cassation.