Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 500/97 AI generated

Court rules remaining in court after testimony justifies absence from work, dismissing disciplinary penalties.

Case Number I PKN 500/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court overturned lower court decisions that upheld disciplinary penalties against two doctors for remaining in the courtroom after giving testimony. The workers argued they stayed at the employer's request to provide additional statements or confront other witnesses, noting they were not summoned again. The court held that staying in court to assist with ongoing proceedings was a justified absence from work, thereby excluding any fault and invalidating the disciplinary sanctions.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 108, Art. 111 KP; Remaining in court after testimony to assist with further proceedings justifies employee absence from work and excludes fault for disciplinary penalties.

Keywords

AI generated
disciplinary penalties employee absence court testimony justified absence workplace discipline legal representation procedural assistance

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 108 KP
Art. 111 KP
§ 6 rozporządzenia Ministra Pracy i Polityki Socjalnej z dnia 15 maja 1996 r.
art. 393 § 13 KPC
art. 393 § 15 KPC
art. 393 § 19 KPC
art. 386 § 1 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text