Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 496/97 AI generated

Employee's failure to object to salary change via board resolution implies implied consent and contract modification.

Case Number I PKN 496/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal regarding unpaid salary differences after a board resolution altered compensation rules. The employee had accepted the new rates for three years without formally challenging the resolution or seeking court recognition of its invalidity. The court ruled that this conduct constituted implied consent, transforming the unilateral board decision into a mutual contract amendment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 42 § 1, 2 KP; Art. 264 § 1 KP; Art. 291 KP; If an employee fails to object to a salary change resolution within internal procedures or to the labor court, and subsequently accepts the new pay for a prolonged period, this implies consent to the contractual modification.

Keywords

AI generated
implied consent labor contract modification salary reduction board resolution unilateral change labor law contractual agreement

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 42 § 1, 2 KP
Art. 264 § 1 KP
Art. 291 KP
Art. 393 § 12 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text