Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ZP 43/97 AI generated

Supreme Court ruled that a municipality's appeal to the Administrative Court against a Voivode's supervisory decision does not require a prior warning to the Voivode.

Case Number III ZP 43/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether a municipality must first warn a Voivode to remove a legal violation before appealing his supervisory decision. The court found that the specific procedural rules in the Local Government Act supersede the general pre-litigation warning requirement of the Administrative Court Act. Consequently, the court held that the general rule of prior warning does not apply to appeals against supervisory decisions concerning municipalities.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 34 ust. 3 ustawy o NSA; Art. 98 ustawy o samorządzie terytorialnym: The general pre-litigation warning procedure required by the Administrative Court Act does not apply to appeals by municipalities against supervisory decisions, as the specific procedural framework of the Local Government Act prevails.

Keywords

AI generated
supervisory decision appeal municipal administrative law pre-litigation warning requirement Local Government Act Administrative Court Act procedural hierarchy legal interpretation

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 34 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 11 maja 1995 r. o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
Art. 91 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 8 marca 1990 r. o samorządzie terytorialnym
Art. 98 ustawy z dnia 8 marca 1990 r. o samorządzie terytorialnym
Art. 13 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 20 września 1984 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
art. 165 ust. 2 Konstytucji
art. 171 ust. 1 Konstytucji

Cited Case Law

AI generated
SA/Sz 444-447/97

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text