Supreme Court dismissed cassation against mandatory quarterly wage increases in a collective remuneration regulation. Workers claimed unfair unilateral changes without notice. Court ruled regulation became part of employment contracts requiring termination for adverse changes.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by employees against a lower court's judgment awarding them higher wages. The workers argued that a unilateral employer regulation mandating quarterly salary increases without proper notice violated their rights. The court held that such a regulation became an integral part of the employment contracts, necessitating a formal termination procedure for any adverse modifications.