Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III AO 25/97 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request for interpretation of judgment reasoning, ruling only the operative part requires interpretation.

Case Number III AO 25/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the Municipality's request for interpretation of a previous judgment. The applicant sought clarification on legal expressions within the reasoning section, arguing the Supreme Court's view on land ownership and municipalization was incorrect. The court held that interpretation applies only to the operative part of a judgment, not its reasoning, and since the operative part was clear, the request was without merit.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 353 KPC; Interpretation of a judgment applies to its operative part, not its reasoning, and requests cannot serve to clarify legal terms in the reasoning or to dispute the court's stance.

Keywords

AI generated
interpretation of judgment operative part reasoning section Supreme Court procedure municipal property law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 353 KPC

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text