I PKN 457/97
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed cassation, ruling oral job instruction suffices if content matches role complexity and employee experience.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Krystyna S. against her dismissal from the 'E.' company. The lower courts found that while the employee lacked a written job description at the time of dismissal, she had been orally informed of her duties by her direct supervisor. The court held that Article 94(1) of the Labor Code allows for oral notification, provided the content is adequate to the job's complexity and the employee's experience.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 94 pkt 1 KP; Art. 328 § 2 KPC; The employer's duty to inform employees of their duties and work methods may be fulfilled orally if the information covers the nature of the work and is appropriate to the employee's qualifications and experience.
Keywords
AI generated
oral job instruction
labor code obligations
dismissal justification
employee duties
cassation appeal
workplace supervision
labor dispute
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 94 pkt 1 KP
Art. 328 § 2 KPC
Art. 100 § 2 pkt 4 KP
Art. 393 § 12 KPC