Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 404/97 AI generated

Diagnosis of mild mental illness alone does not mandate court-appointed counsel under Polish Civil Procedure Code.

Case Number II UKN 404/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's cassation appeal against a disability pension denial, ruling that a diagnosis of mild mental illness does not automatically require court-appointed counsel. The applicant argued that the first-instance court's failure to appoint an attorney violated procedural rights, but the court noted the applicant did not demand this during the trial and later secured one for the appeal. Consequently, the court held that the absence of counsel in the first instance did not render the proceedings void or deprive the applicant of effective defense.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

art. 117 § 1 KPC; art. 379 pkt 5 KPC: The diagnosis of a mild mental illness is not by itself a mandatory ground for appointing court-appointed counsel, and such an omission does not constitute a violation of the right to defense sufficient to invalidate proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
court-appointed counsel mental illness diagnosis procedural validity right to defense civil procedure code disability pension cassation appeal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 117 § 1 KPC
art. 379 pkt 5 KPC
art. 393 § 12 KPC
art. 32 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin
art. 33 ust. 1 pkt 5 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text