Refusal to follow employer orders based on Article 100 § 2 KP is not permissible criticism.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by a radio commentator seeking reinstatement after his contract was terminated for disciplinary reasons. The court found that the employee's refusal to execute specific orders and his actions contrary to the employer's programmatic goals did not constitute permissible criticism under Article 100 § 2 of the Labor Code. Consequently, the court ruled that such conduct justified the employer's decision to terminate the employment contract without notice.