Collective agreement does not bind new employer unless they were a party; changes require employee acceptance.

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiffs' cassation appeal regarding wage differences based on a collective agreement. The plaintiffs argued the agreement mandated higher pay, while the employer claimed the agreement ceased to apply upon their acquisition of the workforce. The court ruled that the collective agreement did not bind the new employer unless they were a party to it, meaning the terms became part of individual contracts subject to change upon employee acceptance.