II UZ 93/97
AI generated
Social insurance appeal dismissed because lawyer lacks permanent employment contract with trade union.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a social insurance decision. The lower court rejected the appeal because the appointed lawyer, Maria Z., failed to provide a valid power of attorney and lacked a permanent employment contract with the trade union. The Supreme Court confirmed that Article 465 § 1 of the Civil Procedure Code requires a permanent relationship, such as an employment or service contract, for a lawyer to file appeals on behalf of union members.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 465 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 89 § 1 k.p.c.: A lawyer may file a cassation appeal for a trade union or pensioners' organization only if they have a permanent employment or service contract with that organization, not merely a temporary advisory relationship.
Keywords
AI generated
social insurance appeals
trade union lawyer
permanent employment contract
cassation procedure
power of attorney
advisory relationship
Civil Procedure Code
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 465 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 89 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 393 § 5 k.p.c.