Cassation dismissed because the subject value of the appeal was under 5,000 zlotys. The court rejected the appeal based on the statutory threshold. The appeal was inadmissible due to the low value of the claim. The court ruled that the appeal was inadmissible because the subject value was below the statutory limit. The court dismissed the cassation appeal as inadmissible due to the low value of the subject matter. The appeal was rejected because the value of the subject matter was below the required threshold. The court dismissed the cassation appeal as inadmissible due to the low value of the subject matter. The appeal was rejected because the value of the subject matter was below the statutory limit. The court dismissed the cassation appeal as inadmissible due to the low value of the subject matter.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Janusz M. against Andrzej B. regarding a labor contract dispute. The plaintiff argued that the defendant refused to sign a fixed-term employment contract, but the court determined the actual claim was for a specific performance of an obligation to declare intent. The court ruled the appeal inadmissible because the calculated value of the subject matter, based on the employee's potential wage, was below the statutory threshold of 5,000 zlotys.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 8 KPC: Cassation is inadmissible in cases of specific performance where the subject value is below five thousand zlotys, as the value is determined by the material legal relationship's worth, such as the wage for a fixed-term employment contract.