I PKN 377/97
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed cassation; refusal of evidence does not deprive party of defense rights.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal against a labor dispute judgment. The lower courts rejected the plaintiff's evidence requests regarding bank loans and witness testimony, finding the dismissal of the employment contract justified by her conflictual behavior and failure to follow orders. The court ruled that refusing specific evidence does not violate the right to defense if the disputed facts have already been sufficiently clarified in the proceedings.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 217 § 2 KPC; Art. 379 pkt 5 KPC; The refusal to admit evidence does not deprive a party of the right to defense if the circumstances in dispute have been sufficiently clarified in the proceedings.
Keywords
AI generated
right to defense
admissibility of evidence
labor dispute
dismissal of employment contract
cassation appeal
clarification of facts
procedural fairness
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 217 § 2 KPC
Art. 379 pkt 5 KPC
Art. 393 § 11 KPC
Art. 393 § 12 KPC
Art. 45 KP