Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 328/97 AI generated

Military pension service period not retroactively extended by civilian employment after discharge.

Case Number II UKN 328/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the applicant's cassation appeal against the military pension bureau's refusal to include post-discharge civilian employment in his pension service period. The applicant argued that a specific legal fiction regarding pension service should be interpreted broadly to cover this employment, while the bureau maintained that the law requires a continuous 20-year military service record for such extensions. The court ruled that the legal fiction is a narrow exception intended only for specific administrative adjustments and cannot be expanded by interpretation to apply to new service period calculations.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 53 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym żołnierzy zawodowych; Art. 53 ust. 6 ustawy: The legal fiction of pension service treated as military service is a narrow exception that cannot be extended by interpretation to cover civilian employment performed after discharge for the purpose of increasing pension entitlements.

Keywords

AI generated
military pension service period calculation legal fiction interpretation limitation post-discharge employment continuous service requirement administrative adjustment

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 53 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 10 grudnia 1993 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym żołnierzy zawodowych oraz ich rodzin
art. 53 ust. 6 ustawy z dnia 10 grudnia 1993 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym żołnierzy zawodowych oraz ich rodzin
art. 14 ust. 1 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 10 grudnia 1993 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym żołnierzy zawodowych oraz ich rodzin
art. 11 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 16 grudnia 1972 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym żołnierzy zawodowych oraz ich rodzin
art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II UKN 225/97

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text