Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ZP 38/97 AI generated

Supreme Court rules employee claim deadlines are substantive law subject to procedural extension under KPA Art. 58.

Case Number III ZP 38/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court resolved a legal question regarding whether specific deadlines in the Employee Claims Protection Act are substantive or procedural. The Court determined these deadlines are substantive but subject to extension under the Civil Procedure Act. Consequently, the labor court may apply procedural extension rules to revive expired claims for unpaid wages from the Employee Benefits Fund.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 7 ust. 1, 3, 4 ustawy z dnia 29 grudnia 1993 r. o ochronie roszczeń pracowniczych w razie niewypłacalności pracodawcy; Art. 58 KPA: Deadlines in the Employee Claims Protection Act are substantive law terms subject to procedural extension under the Civil Procedure Act, allowing labor courts to revive expired claims for unpaid benefits.

Keywords

AI generated
employee claims protection substantive law deadlines procedural extension Employee Benefits Fund civil procedure act unpaid wages labor dispute

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 7 ust. 1, 3, 4 of the Act of 29 December 1993 on the protection of employee claims in the event of the employer's insolvency
Art. 58 of the Code of Civil Procedure

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text