Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III KKO 7/97 AI generated

Heirs of a 1944 land reform victim must sue civilly, not administratively, to challenge automatic state property transfer.

Case Number III KKO 7/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Allowed / Granted

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court allowed heirs to file a civil suit to determine that a 1944 land reform transfer to the state was invalid. The heirs argued the transfer lacked legal basis, while the administrative court rejected their claim as a civil matter. The court ruled that since the property passed to the state by operation of law, only a civil judgment can overturn this automatic transfer.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 2 ust. 1 lit. b dekretu z dnia 6 września 1944 r. o przeprowadzeniu reformy rolnej; A claim to overturn a property transfer made by operation of law must be pursued via civil litigation, not administrative proceedings.

Keywords

AI generated
land reform decree property transfer by operation of law civil vs administrative jurisdiction heirs of reform victims state property acquisition

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 2 ust. 1 lit. b dekretu z dnia 6 września 1944 r. o przeprowadzeniu reformy rolnej
Art. 2 ust. 1 in fine dekretu z dnia 6 września 1944 r. o przeprowadzeniu reformy rolnej

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III CRN 34/95

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text