Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III RN 46/97 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed extraordinary review, ruling tax delay penalties are discretionary but not automatically waived by administrative delays.

Case Number III RN 46/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review filed by the Ombudsman against the Supreme Administrative Court's decision to deny the waiver of tax delay penalties. The Ombudsman argued that the tax authority's significant delays in issuing the assessment decision and initiating proceedings should have triggered a mandatory waiver under the Tax Obligations Act. The court held that while the statute grants discretion to waive penalties for economic or social reasons, the mere passage of time or administrative slowness does not automatically justify such a waiver, as the tax liability and subsequent penalty obligations arose independently of the authority's conduct.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 31 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 19 grudnia 1980 r. o zobowiązaniach podatkowych; Art. 7 ustawy o zobowiązaniach podatkowych: The discretion to waive tax delay penalties under Art. 31 ust. 1 is not absolute and does not automatically apply to situations caused by administrative delays, requiring specific economic or social justification.

Keywords

AI generated
tax delay penalties waiver discretion administrative delay extraordinary review tax obligations act

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 31 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 19 grudnia 1980 r. o zobowiązaniach podatkowych
Art. 7 ustawy o zobowiązaniach podatkowych
Art. 20 ust. 1 ustawy o zobowiązaniach podatkowych

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text