II UKN 284/97
AI generated
Spousal administrative work in a lawyer's office is not considered business cooperation for social insurance purposes.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the wife's cassation appeal against the Social Insurance Institution's refusal to cover her under social insurance. The court held that performing administrative tasks in a husband's individual law firm does not constitute business cooperation under the relevant social insurance statute. Consequently, the court ruled that such work does not trigger mandatory social insurance obligations by analogy to other business activities.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 26 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy o ubezpieczeniu społecznym osób prowadzących działalność gospodarczą; Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.; Spousal administrative work in a lawyer's office is not considered business cooperation for social insurance purposes.
Keywords
AI generated
social insurance coverage
business cooperation definition
lawyer office administration
spousal employment status
mandatory insurance obligation
individual practice structure
analogy application
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 26 ust. 1 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 18 grudnia 1976 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym osób prowadzących działalność gospodarczą oraz ich rodzin
Art. 393 § 12 k.p.c.