Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III SZ 3/97 AI generated

Appeal to Supreme Court dismissed because teacher received dismissal from job, not expulsion from profession. Appeal right only exists for expulsion penalty under Teacher's Charter.

Case Number III SZ 3/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by teacher Ryszard L. against a disciplinary decision ordering his dismissal from employment. The lower disciplinary body had imposed a penalty for dismissal from work rather than expulsion from the teaching profession. The court ruled that the statutory right to appeal to the Supreme Court applies exclusively to cases involving expulsion from the profession, rendering the appeal procedurally inadmissible.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 76 ust. 1 pkt 4; Art. 77 ust. 5 Karty Nauczyciela: The right to appeal to the Supreme Court against a disciplinary decision applies only when the penalty is expulsion from the profession, not dismissal from employment.

Keywords

AI generated
Teacher's Charter disciplinary penalty expulsion from profession dismissal from employment Supreme Court appeal procedural inadmissibility discipline law

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 76 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. – Karta Nauczyciela
art. 77 ust. 5 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. – Karta Nauczyciela
art. 77 ust. 3 i ust. 4 Karty Nauczyciela
art. 13 pkt 5 ustawy z dnia 20 września 1984 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
art. 370 KPC

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text