III SZ 3/97
AI generated
Appeal to Supreme Court dismissed because teacher received dismissal from job, not expulsion from profession. Appeal right only exists for expulsion penalty under Teacher's Charter.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal filed by teacher Ryszard L. against a disciplinary decision ordering his dismissal from employment. The lower disciplinary body had imposed a penalty for dismissal from work rather than expulsion from the teaching profession. The court ruled that the statutory right to appeal to the Supreme Court applies exclusively to cases involving expulsion from the profession, rendering the appeal procedurally inadmissible.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 76 ust. 1 pkt 4; Art. 77 ust. 5 Karty Nauczyciela: The right to appeal to the Supreme Court against a disciplinary decision applies only when the penalty is expulsion from the profession, not dismissal from employment.
Keywords
AI generated
Teacher's Charter
disciplinary penalty
expulsion from profession
dismissal from employment
Supreme Court appeal
procedural inadmissibility
discipline law
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 76 ust. 1 pkt 4 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. – Karta Nauczyciela
art. 77 ust. 5 ustawy z dnia 26 stycznia 1982 r. – Karta Nauczyciela
art. 77 ust. 3 i ust. 4 Karty Nauczyciela
art. 13 pkt 5 ustawy z dnia 20 września 1984 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
art. 370 KPC