Supreme Court dismissed cassation as facts were sufficiently clarified and evidence rules not violated.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Feliksa K. against the Social Insurance Office's denial of a war invalidity pension. The court found that the lower court had sufficiently clarified the disputed facts regarding the applicant's health status after her time in a transit camp during World War II. Consequently, the court ruled that the refusal to admit new witness testimonies and expert opinions did not violate procedural laws because the contested circumstances were already adequately explained.