Legislator Case Law & Legislation
III ZP 27/97 AI generated

Supreme Court dismissed legal question submission due to cassation appeal rights in social insurance dispute.

Case Number III ZP 27/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court refused to answer the legal question submitted by the Court of Appeal regarding the obligation of agricultural social insurance. The appellant, a former employee, argued that his period of sick leave and rehabilitation should extend his coverage under agricultural insurance, while the insurer claimed he was covered only until he acquired unemployment benefits. The court ruled that since a cassation appeal was available, the legal issue could not be forwarded under the specific procedure for questions without cassation rights.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 390 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 KPC: A legal question may be submitted to the Supreme Court only in cases where cassation is not admissible, as the right to cassation precludes the use of the question procedure.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal legal question procedure social insurance coverage agricultural insurance sick leave benefits second instance court Supreme Court ruling

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 390 § 1 KPC
art. 393 KPC
art. 16 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników
art. 4 ust. 3 ustawy z dnia 25 listopada 1986 r. o organizacji i finansowaniu ubezpieczeń społecznych
art. 6 pkt 13 ustawy z dnia 20 grudnia 1990 r. o ubezpieczeniu społecznym rolników

Cited Case Law

AI generated

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text