Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 260/97 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes disability pension ruling for student due to expert opinion lacking clarity on disability grade.

Case Number II UKN 260/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court of Poland quashed the lower court's decision denying a student disability pension because the expert medical opinion raised justified doubts regarding its clarity. The expert stated the student's vision worsened but failed to categorically specify the resulting disability grade or date of onset, leaving the assessment ambiguous. Consequently, the court held that the lower court was obligated to request supplementary expert opinions or clarifications before rendering a final judgment.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 3 § 2 KPC; Art. 63 ust. 1 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin: If a court expert opinion raises justified doubts regarding its clarity or completeness, the court is obligated to request supplementary opinions or clarifications before issuing a final decision.

Keywords

AI generated
disability pension eligibility expert medical opinion clarity student disability status supplementary expert opinion necessity of clarification

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 3 § 2 KPC
art. 63 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin
art. 12 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r. o zmianie Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated
II URN 237/88

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text