Cassation dismissed; court upheld lower court's finding of no employment contract due to missing mutual acceptance.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation against the second-instance judgment in a dispute to determine the existence of an employment relationship. The appellant argued that a verbal agreement was formed despite missing written documentation, while the lower courts relied on evidence including witness testimony and the appellant's own knowledge of the job offer. The court rejected the cassation because the first instance properly conducted additional evidence collection and the second instance correctly applied the law without violating procedural requirements.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 477 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 8 k.p.; An employment contract requires mutual consent, and the failure to accept a job offer within the specified deadline precludes the existence of an employment relationship, even if a verbal agreement is alleged.