Supreme Court dismisses appeal against incidental judge recusal order as it does not end proceedings under Civil Procedure Code.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a second-instance court order rejecting a request to recuse a judge. The appellant argued this procedural ruling violated substantive labor law rights regarding wage confirmation, but the court held that such orders are incidental and do not terminate the main proceedings. Consequently, the appeal was rejected because only final judgments ending the entire case are subject to cassation under the Civil Procedure Code.