I PKN 233/97
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed teacher's appeal claiming consent to job transfer was invalid due to wrong recipient of agreement.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding her request to be reinstated at her original school. The plaintiff argued that her written consent to transfer was invalid because it was addressed to the Education Office rather than her employer. The court ruled that the written consent was correctly addressed to the employer and thus effective, meaning she was no longer an employee of the original school.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 22 § 1 KP; Art. 18 Karta Nauczyciela; Art. 5 ust. 7 ustawy o systemie oświaty: A teacher's consent to a job transfer addressed to the employer is valid even if the consent form was submitted to the Education Office, thereby terminating the previous employment relationship.
Keywords
AI generated
teacher employment
job transfer consent
cassation appeal
employment relationship
education law
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 22 § 1 KP
Art. 18 Karta Nauczyciela
Art. 5 ust. 7 ustawy o systemie oświaty
Art. 39312 KPC
Art. 3933 KPC