Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III RN 35/97 AI generated

Supreme Court quashes administrative court ruling for failing to set binding planning conditions regarding building shadows.

Case Number III RN 35/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the administrative court's decision to overturn the original planning permit, finding a procedural error in the appellate body's reasoning. The lower court incorrectly dismissed the requirement for a shadow analysis (sun line) and failed to establish binding technical conditions for the building's expansion. Consequently, the case was remanded to the administrative court for a fresh examination of these specific legal requirements.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 42 ust. 1 pkt 3 i 5 ustawy o zagospodarowaniu przestrzennym; Art. 138 § 2 KPA: The administrative court must establish binding technical conditions and requirements for building projects, including shadow analysis, rather than merely listing investor obligations, as such conditions are essential for the architect and builder.

Keywords

AI generated
building conditions shadow analysis administrative review planning law binding requirements remand for retrial sun line

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 42 ust. 1 pkt 3 i 5 ustawy o zagospodarowaniu przestrzennym
Art. 138 § 2 KPA
Art. 7 i 77 § 1 KPA
Art. 22 ust. 1 pkt 1 i ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 11 maja 1995 r. o Naczelnym Sądzie Administracyjnym
Art. 393 § 13 KPC
Art. 10 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r. o zmianie Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego

Cited Case Law

AI generated
VI SA 13/95

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text