II UKN 130/97
AI generated
Work accident claim dismissed; lifting batteries aggravated pre-existing back condition qualifies as work accident under Art. 6. Work accident claim dismissed; lifting batteries aggravated pre-existing back condition qualifies under Art. 6. Work accident claim dismissed; lifting batteries aggravated pre-existing back condition qualifies under Art. 6.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that recognized a work accident. The employee claimed a work accident occurred when lifting batteries aggravated his pre-existing back condition, while the employer argued the pain was a natural progression of his illness. The court held that the sudden and severe aggravation of the back condition caused by the lifting constituted a work accident under the relevant statute.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 6 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych; A work accident is established when performing duties causes a sudden and severe aggravation of pre-existing health conditions.
Keywords
AI generated
work accident recognition
pre-existing condition aggravation
lifting heavy objects
back injury compensation
cassation appeal dismissal
work injury statute
sudden health deterioration
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 6 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 12 czerwca 1975 r. o świadczeniach z tytułu wypadków przy pracy i chorób zawodowych
art. 392 § 1 KPC
art. 393 § 12 KPC
art. 98 § 1 KPC