Supreme Court quashes social security judgment for lack of written reasoning and remands case.

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's judgment due to the absence of a written reasoning, remanding the case for a new trial. The applicant, a farmer, sought disability pension based on long-term inability to work in his specific farm, arguing the lower court failed to properly assess his condition against the statutory six-month threshold. The court upheld the cassation request, emphasizing that the law requires an evaluation of incapacity relative to the specific farm's needs rather than general agricultural work.