I PKN 170/97
AI generated
Dismissal of appeal: Invalid or unjustified termination of employment contract does not render it void ab initio.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by an employee against a labor court ruling that rejected his claim for severance pay. The employee argued that his dismissal was invalid and that he had not been effectively terminated, while the employer contended the notice was legally effective. The court held that even if a termination notice was flawed or unjustified, it still produces legal consequences and cannot be declared void by operation of law.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 61 KC; Art. 65 KC; Art. 97 § 1, 2 KP; Art. 233 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 1, 2 KPC: A termination of an employment contract, even if legally flawed or unjustified, produces legal effects and is not void ab initio.
Keywords
AI generated
termination of employment contract
void ab initio
legal consequences of notice
cassation appeal dismissal
labor law principles
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 61 KC
Art. 65 KC
Art. 97 § 1 KP
Art. 97 § 2 KP
Art. 233 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 1 KPC
Art. 393 § 2 KPC
Art. 98 KPC