Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 155/97 AI generated

Employee's refusal to work to force employer response dismissed; damages awarded instead.

Case Number I PKN 155/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Partially Allowed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court quashed the lower court's dismissal of the employee's claim for reinstatement and ordered damages. The employee had refused to report to work to compel the Ministry to answer a letter, which the court found was a factual act rather than a legal resignation. Consequently, while the refusal constituted a serious breach justifying termination, the specific intent to quit was absent, leading to a reversal of the dismissal and an award of compensation.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 KP; Art. 65 § 1 KP: An employee's refusal to report to work to force the employer to respond to a letter does not constitute abandonment of work, but may justify termination without notice if it represents a serious breach of duties.

Keywords

AI generated
abandonment of work serious breach of duties termination without notice compensation for damages labor dispute employee resignation procedural reversal

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 52 § 1 pkt 1 KP
Art. 65 § 1 KP
Art. 477 § 2 KPC
Art. 8 KP
Art. 56 § 1 KP
Art. 393 § 13 KPC

Cited Case Law

AI generated
I PRN 49/76
I PRN 38/77
I PRN 144/76

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text