Supreme Court dismissed appeal as inadmissible because the case concerns pension amount, not entitlement, under KPC Art. 393.1.

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal as inadmissible, ruling that the dispute concerned the calculation of the pension amount rather than the right to receive it. The appellant argued that the pension was undervalued due to errors in the base indicator and base amount used by the social insurance agency, claiming a difference of over 2,390 PLN. The court determined that since the disputed value was below the 5,000 PLN threshold for cassation under Article 393 of the Code of Civil Procedure, the appeal was procedurally barred.