I PKN 117/97
AI generated
Labor dispute dismissed: employee's aiding management breach does not exempt them from dismissal.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the employee's cassation appeal regarding her termination for breach of duty. The lower court found that the employee's errors in accounting and refusal to cooperate with inspections constituted a violation of her obligations, which the employer cited as grounds for dismissal. The Supreme Court ruled that the employee's role in exposing management's potential misconduct did not negate her own failures or justify leniency in her case.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 1 KPC; Art. 393 12 KPC: An employee's assistance in revealing breaches by management does not exempt them from liability for their own breaches of duty or prevent dismissal for such breaches.
Keywords
AI generated
labor law
dismissal grounds
breach of duty
cassation appeal
employee obligations
management misconduct
labor dispute
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 393 1 KPC
Art. 393 12 KPC
Art. 45 KP
Art. 8 KP