II UZ 25/97
AI generated
Supreme Court dismisses appeal because a personal appeal lacks mandatory lawyer signature under Polish Civil Procedure Code.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal against a lower court's rejection of his personal cassation. The appellant argued that appointing a lawyer after filing the appeal should cure the defect, but the court held that the entire appeal must comply with mandatory lawyer representation rules from the outset. Consequently, the personal filing rendered the appeal inadmissible regardless of subsequent legal representation.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 § 1, 393 § 5, 393 § 18, 393 § 19, 465 § 1 KPC; A cassation filed personally by a party without a lawyer's signature is inadmissible and cannot be cured by the subsequent appointment of counsel.
Keywords
AI generated
mandatory lawyer representation
inadmissible cassation
personal appeal filing
civil procedure code
adwokat ustanowienie
przymus adwokacki
Sąd Najwyższy
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 393 § 1 KPC
art. 393 § 5 KPC
art. 393 § 18 KPC
art. 393 § 19 KPC
art. 397 KPC
art. 465 § 1 KPC