Supreme Court dismisses extraordinary review for failing to show gross legal violation despite differing interpretation of building law.

The Supreme Court dismissed the extraordinary review against the administrative court's decision regarding the mandatory demolition of a wooden shed. The applicant argued the lower court incorrectly interpreted the Building Law, but the Supreme Court noted that merely expressing a different legal view does not automatically invalidate a ruling. The court held that a violation must be so severe it causes unacceptable consequences in a democratic state to warrant overturning the decision. Consequently, the review was rejected because the administrative court's interpretation, while differing, did not constitute a gross violation of the law.