Cassation dismissed because appellate court logically rejected witness testimony as irrelevant to the social insurance dispute.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by a farmer against a social insurance decision. The appellant argued that witness testimony should have been admitted and questioned the calculation of contributions, but failed to specify how the law was violated. The court ruled that the appellate court's logical rejection of the evidence as irrelevant to the case's resolution constituted a valid ground for dismissal.