Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 120/97 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal filed late, ruling that applying for a court-appointed lawyer does not extend the statutory appeal period.

Case Number I PKN 120/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's cassation appeal filed in January 1997, which was submitted well after the one-month deadline expired in August 1996. The appellant had requested a court-appointed lawyer after the deadline passed, arguing this should have extended the time limit for filing the appeal. The court held that the delivery of the court's decision to the party personally legally triggered the appeal period, and subsequent actions like requesting a lawyer do not interrupt or extend this statutory timeframe.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 393 § 4 KPC; Art. 393 § 5 KPC; Art. 393 § 8 KPC: The delivery of a final decision to the party personally initiates the appeal period, and a subsequent request for a court-appointed lawyer does not extend or interrupt this statutory time limit.

Keywords

AI generated
civil procedure code appeal period court appointed lawyer statutory time limit cassation appeal delivery of decision procedural deadline

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 393 § 4 KPC
art. 393 § 5 KPC
art. 393 § 8 KPC
art. 11 ust. 1 KPC
art. 392 § 1 KPC

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Postanowienie z dnia 26 listopada 1975 r., III PR 117/75
Postanowienie z dnia 22 kwietnia 1997 r., II UZ 13/97
Postanowienie z dnia 24 stycznia 1997 r., II UZ 14/96
Postanowienie z dnia 26 maja 1997 r., II UZ 32/97

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text