Supreme Court dismissed cassation alleging procedural violation of social security agency proceedings was inadmissible.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Artur S. against a second-instance court decision denying his veteran's disability pension. The appellant argued that the Social Security Agency violated procedural rules by issuing a medical opinion without conducting a personal examination. The court ruled that such procedural violations in agency proceedings are inadmissible grounds for cassation and that even if they occurred, they would not affect the final judgment.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 392 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 3 KPC: A cassation appeal alleging a procedural violation by a social security agency is inadmissible, and even if a procedural defect existed in the second-instance proceedings, it must have materially affected the outcome to be a valid ground for cassation.