Legislator Case Law & Legislation
DE FR IT EN
Analyze in Legislator
III ZP 15/97 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses request for legal clarification as only authorized bodies may submit such requests.

Case Number III ZP 15/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed
Open official source Machine-readable Markdown (.md)

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court refused to issue a ruling clarifying specific provisions of the Social Labor Inspection Act upon the request of a municipal enterprise. The court determined that the applicant lacked statutory standing because only the First President, the President of the Supreme Court, the Minister of Justice, the Ombudsman, and specific labor ministry officials are authorized to submit such requests. Consequently, the procedural requirement for a qualified petitioner was not met, leading to the rejection of the case.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 16 ust. 2 ustawy o Sądzie Najwyższym; Art. 22 ust. 2 ustawy o związkach zawodowych: The Supreme Court may issue rulings to clarify legal provisions only upon requests from statutorily authorized entities, excluding other administrative bodies or enterprises.

Keywords

AI generated
standing to request legal clarification ruling Supreme Court procedure authorized petitioners social labor inspection

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 16 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 20 września 1984 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
art. 13 pkt 3 ustawy z dnia 20 września 1984 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym
art. 22 ust. 2 ustawy z dnia 23 maja 1991 r. o związkach zawodowych
art. 190 § 1 Kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego
art. 20 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 20 września 1984 r. o Sądzie Najwyższym

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text