Legislator Case Law & Legislation
II UKN 11/97 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses disability pension appeal, ruling joint expert opinion suffices even without explicit 'joint' label.

Case Number II UKN 11/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by Marianna H. against a denial of a disability pension. The lower courts determined the applicant was not disabled based on a joint medical examination where experts concluded she retained full manual and locomotor capacity. The Supreme Court held that a joint expert opinion meeting specific procedural criteria constitutes a valid joint opinion regardless of its formal title.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 285 § 2 KPC; Art. 24 ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy o powszechnym zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym; A joint expert opinion issued after a collective examination and analysis of medical documentation, considering results as a whole and containing a common conclusion on employment capacity, satisfies the legal requirements for a joint opinion even if not explicitly labeled as such.

Keywords

AI generated
joint expert opinion disability pension medical assessment employment capacity cassation appeal social security law procedural requirements

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 285 § 2 KPC
Art. 24 ust. 2 pkt 1 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o powszechnym zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin
Art. 393 § 12 KPC
Art. 32 ustawy z dnia 14 grudnia 1982 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym pracowników i ich rodzin

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text