I PKN 33/97
AI generated
Supreme Court dismissed appeal allowing employer to change employment terms via mutual agreement from appointment to contract.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's cassation appeal regarding a dispute over employment conditions. The lower courts found that a mutual agreement transformed the plaintiff's appointment-based employment into a standard employment contract with new terms. The court ruled that such agreements are valid and that the plaintiff's failure to file a separate action to declare the change ineffective meant she accepted the new arrangement.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 30 § 1 pkt 1 KP; Art. 68 i następnych KP; A mutual agreement may resolve an employment relationship based on appointment and establish a new contract with altered terms, provided the employee accepts the change.
Keywords
AI generated
mutual agreement
employment contract
appointment based
change of terms
labor law
cassation appeal
employee acceptance
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 30 § 1 pkt 1 KP
Art. 68 i następnych KP
Art. 70 KP
Art. 45 § 1 w związku z art. 42 § 1 KP
Art. 264 § 1 KP
Art. 291 KP
Art. 393 12 KPC
Art. 102 KPC w związku z art. 393 19 i 391 KPC
Cited Case Law
AI generateduchwała Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 21 grudnia 1987 r., III PZP 47/87
Wyrok z dnia 22 grudnia 1976 r., I PRN 121/76