I PKN 27/97
AI generated
Civil appeal dismissed; failure to cite specific violated laws renders procedural grounds inadmissible.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal in part regarding procedural violations and in full regarding material law violations. The appellant argued that the Social Insurance Fund and Ministry's opinions were ignored, but the court found the appeal inadmissible because it failed to cite specific violated statutes. Consequently, the cassation was rejected for lacking the required legal basis and reasoning.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 84 § 1 KPC; Art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC; Art. 393 § 3 KPC; Art. 393 § 8 § 1 KPC: A cassation appeal is inadmissible if it does not specify the exact legal provisions violated and explain the nature of the breach.
Keywords
AI generated
cassation appeal
inadmissible grounds
specific legal provisions
procedural law
substantive law violation
civil procedure code
supreme court ruling
Cited Legislation
AI generatedart. 84 § 1 KPC
art. 84 § 2 KPC
art. 393 § 1 pkt 2 KPC
art. 393 § 3 KPC
art. 393 § 8 § 1 KPC
art. 30 ust. 5 ustawy z dnia 12 października 1994 r. o samorządowych kolegiach odwoławczych
Cited Case Law
AI generatedII CR 68/73
C III 319/37
C II 859/36
I PKN 22/96
Supreme Court dismisses appeal for lack of substantive grounds and reasoning as required by law.