Supreme Court dismisses pension agency's request to restart proceedings regarding disability pension eligibility. The court ruled that the agency cannot assume facts from civil court complaints. The decision clarifies that administrative and judicial review procedures are distinct legal institutions.

The Supreme Court dismissed the pension agency's request to restart proceedings regarding the applicant's disability pension eligibility. The agency argued that the lower court failed to examine the applicant's earnings history, which was crucial for determining if the disability arose within the required 18-month period after employment ended. The court held that the agency cannot assume facts from the applicant's civil court complaint and that the administrative review procedure under the pension law is distinct from judicial review under the Civil Procedure Code.