I PKN 16/97
AI generated
Appeal dismissed; reinstatement claim is procedural, not monetary, so value threshold doesn't apply.
Poland (PL)
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court dismissed the appeal regarding the reinstatement of an employee to her job. The defendant argued that the lower court incorrectly interpreted regulations on parental leave, but the court focused on the procedural nature of the claim. Since the primary goal of a reinstatement suit is to establish a new legal employment relationship rather than merely award damages, the appeal was inadmissible due to the monetary value threshold.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 393 pkt 1 KPC; Art. 469 KPC; Art. 355 § 1 KPC; Art. 391 KPC; A claim for reinstatement to work is procedural in nature and does not depend on the value of the subject matter for the admissibility of an appeal.
Keywords
AI generated
reinstatement to work
appeal admissibility
value threshold
procedural claim
employment relationship
parental leave
civil procedure code
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 393 pkt 1 KPC
Art. 469 KPC
Art. 355 § 1 KPC
Art. 391 KPC
Art. 47 § 1 KP
Art. 48 § 1 KP
Cited Case Law
AI generateduchwała składu siedmiu sędziów Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 28 maja 1976 r., V PZP 12/75
OSNCP 1976 z. 9 poz. 187
PiP 1979 nr 1 s. 171
PiP 1977 nr 7 s. 166
NP 1978 nr 2 s. 318
OSPiKA 1978 z. 6 poz. 103