II UKN 92/96
AI generated
Supreme Court quashes lower court rulings on miner's pension calculation due to unclear evidence of underground work status.
Legislator summary
AI generatedThe Supreme Court quashed the appellate and first-instance judgments regarding the calculation of a miner's disability pension. The lower courts failed to properly evaluate conflicting employment records that either described the claimant as working underground or on the surface. Consequently, the court remanded the case for a fresh factual determination of whether the specific duties performed qualified for the higher pension multiplier.
Legislator headnote
AI generatedArt. 6 ust. 1 ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym górników i ich rodzin; Art. 393 § 1 KPC: The court must remand a case when the existing evidence is insufficient to determine if specific mining duties qualify for a higher pension rate due to ambiguous employment records.
Keywords
AI generated
miner's pension calculation
underground work status
employment record ambiguity
pension multiplier application
remand for retrial
social security benefits
factual uncertainty
Cited Legislation
AI generatedArt. 6 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 1 lutego 1983 r. o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym górników i ich rodzin
Art. 2 ust. 2 pkt 2 ustawy z dnia 30 czerwca 1994 r. o zmianie ustawy o zaopatrzeniu emerytalnym górników i ich rodzin oraz o zmianie niektórych ustaw
Dz. U. z 1995 r., Nr 30, poz. 154
Dz.U. z 1995 r., Nr 2, poz. 8
Art. 393 § 1 KPC