Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PKN 7/97 AI generated

Civil appeal dismissed; Supreme Court upheld labor law findings despite procedural cost rule exception.

Case Number I PKN 7/97
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the civil appeal filed by the Ombudsman regarding a labor dispute. The Ombudsman argued for a retrial based on a specific cost allocation statute, but the Court ruled that Article 393(1) of the Civil Procedure Code applies regardless of the appeal's value. The Court found the lower court's assessment of the employee's negligence in managing fuel and inventory was a valid legal evaluation of established facts, not a factual error. Consequently, the appeal was rejected, and the appellant was ordered to pay the procedural costs.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Art. 12 ust. 1 ustawy o zmianie KPC; Art. 393 pkt 1 KPC: An appeal filed under the special cost allocation provision is admissible and subject to standard cost rules, and a higher court may legally evaluate facts differently from a lower court without committing a procedural violation.

Keywords

AI generated
civil appeal admissibility labor law negligence factual evaluation review procedural costs allocation employee duty of care Supreme Court cassation internal control failure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
Art. 12 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 1 marca 1996 r. o zmianie Kodeksu postępowania cywilnego
Art. 393 pkt 1 KPC
Art. 98 § 1 KPC
Art. 391 KPC
§ 18 ust. 3 w związku z § 17 ust. 1 pkt 1 rozporządzenia Ministra Sprawiedliwości z dnia 4 czerwca 1992 r. w sprawie opłat za czynności adwokackie

Cited Case Law

AI generated
III PZP 8/72 (OSNCP 1973 z. 5 poz. 71)

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text