Supreme Court dismisses cassation; regaining farm ownership and leasing it does not lose concurrent benefit rights if farming isn't undertaken.

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal against a lower court ruling that restored the applicant's right to concurrent social benefits. The applicant regained ownership of a farm in September 1994 but immediately leased it for ten years, failing to personally farm it due to seasonal constraints. The court held that regaining ownership and leasing the property did not constitute 'undertaking farming' under the relevant social insurance law, thus preserving the applicant's right to the concurrent benefit.