Legislator Case Law & Legislation
I PZ 6/96 AI generated

Supreme Court dismisses appeal arguing unpublished Supreme Court rulings lack binding legal force.

Case Number I PZ 6/96
Court / Authority
Jurisdiction Poland (PL)
Decision Date
Outcome Dismissed

Legislator summary

AI generated

The Supreme Court dismissed the appellant's appeal, which claimed a lower court's decision relied on an unpublished Supreme Court ruling that lacked binding legal force. The appellant argued that only published judicial decisions bind citizens, while the lower court cited an unpublished precedent to reject the labor dispute appeal. The court ruled that the lower court's rejection was based on statutory limitations on lawyers' standing to file appeals, not on the binding nature of the cited unpublished decision.

Legislator headnote

AI generated

Ustawa z dnia 17 czerwca 1964 r. – Kodeks postępowania cywilnego; Ustawa z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o radcach prawnych; Ustawa z dnia 23 grudnia 1988 r. o działalności gospodarczej: A lawyer may not effectively file a cassation appeal on behalf of a natural person in labor disputes unless authorized by specific statutes, regardless of whether the cited Supreme Court precedent is published.

Keywords

AI generated
cassation appeal standing unpublished judicial decisions binding legal force lawyer authorization labor dispute procedure

Cited Legislation

AI generated
art. 385 in conjunction with art. 397 of the Code of Civil Procedure
art. 393 paragraphs 18 and 19 of the Code of Civil Procedure
Ustawa z dnia 6 lipca 1982 r. o radcach prawnych
Ustawa z dnia 23 grudnia 1988 r. o działalności gospodarczej

Cited Case Law

AI generated
Supreme Court decision of 27 August 1996, I PKN 6/96

Need to analyze how this precedent applies to your matter?

Cross-reference this judgment against statutes, commentaries, and subsequent citing case law inside Legislator AI.

Open in Legislator →

Full text